Try Fund Library Premium

Free with a 30 day trial!

Gain access to

  • Unlimited Watchlists
  • Advanced Search Filtering
  • Fund Comparisons
  • Portfolio Scenarios
  • Customizable PDF Reports
  • Portfolio Rebalancer new

SpaceX launches biggest-ever IPO

Published on 06-18-2026

Share This Article

Convergence of public and private capital

 

On June 12, SpaceX went public with a US$2 trillion valuation – the largest initial public offering (IPO) ever, by far. It has been the most anticipated IPO in more than two decades and likely ushers in a series of high-profile IPOs in the coming months, including for OpenAI and Anthropic. The SpaceX IPO shifts the way that we think about public and private equity.

Elon Musk founded SpaceX – Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (NSD: SPCX) – in 2002, before Tesla, and has intentionally kept the company private as he’s built the firm and its vertical businesses – Starlink and XAI. Musk recognized that SpaceX couldn’t survive as a public company during the development phase, and since he was able to raise capital, he chose a path different from most young startups during the dot-com era.

The changing dynamics of private equity

While SpaceX is an extreme example, given its size and tenure as a going concern (24 years), it illustrates the shifting dynamics between public and private companies. Over the last two decades, the number of companies in the U.S. publicly-traded market has been roughly half its size during previous decades, declining from about 8,000 companies in 1996 to about 4,000 companies in 2025.1 Meanwhile, the number of U.S. private companies has been rising. Today, 87% of all U.S. companies with at least US$100 million in revenue are private.2 This represents approximately 20,000 companies, and globally, there are approximately 100,000 private companies.

A second dynamic is that companies are staying private longer. During the dot-com era, the only paths for young companies was to bring their company public via an IPO or be acquired by a larger firm. This allowed founders and senior executives to reap the benefits of building their enterprise and monetizing the opportunity. Today, with the abundance of capital available, companies can choose to remain private longer, and some will never go public.

Staying private allows these young companies to execute their long-term plan, rather than meeting the quarterly demands of shareholders. In the SpaceX example, staying private insulated Musk from public scrutiny when the first three rockets blew up. It also allowed him to build vertical businesses like Starlink and XAI. Building these businesses in the public domain would have been very challenging, if not impossible.

What does this mean for private equity going forward?

Coming into 2026, we had anticipated a pickup in exits (IPOs and merger and acquisition [M&A] activity). This was delayed due to the Middle Eastern conflict – but there appears to be a robust pipeline of companies going public in the next year or so. More exits mean that more capital is returned to investors in the form of distributions. Since 2021, distributions have been anemic, leading institutions to seek liquidity in the secondaries market.

It is important to note that we do not believe secondaries lose their appeal as distributions improve. We continue to believe that institutions will utilize the secondary market to meet their liquidity needs, and we think secondaries represent a core private equity allocation in the wealth channel, due to its structural advantages (it can help shorten the J-curve and time to distribution), and built-in diversification (GP, vintage, geography and stage).

SpaceX and these other high-profile IPOs remind investors about the opportunities in private equity. Much like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla before them, SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic each began with an idea. These ideas were nurtured and refined as private companies. As their businesses grew, and they scaled their operating models, they each chose to take their companies public via an IPO.

The SpaceX IPO serves as a reminder of the convergence of public and private capital. Private companies now have alternatives to an IPO and can often choose the best path for each enterprise. SpaceX will become one of the largest publicly traded companies after its IPO. This was a 24-year journey.

Tony Davidow of Franklin Templeton is Senior Alternatives Investment Strategist, Franklin Templeton Institute.

Notes

1. Sources: US Census Bureau, World Bank, Macrobond. As of December 31, 2025.
2. Sources: “Private Market Investing: Staying Private Longer Leads to Opportunity.” Hamilton Lane. April 14, 2022. “The Truth Revealed: The private markets universe is less concentrated and larger today than any other time in history.” Hamilton Lane. March 8, 2023.

Disclaimer

Content copyright © 2026 by Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

What are the risks? All investments involve risks, including the possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Investing in the natural resources sector involves special risks, including increased susceptibility to adverse economic and regulatory developments affecting the sector. Special risks are associated with investing in foreign securities, including risks associated with political and economic developments, trading practices, availability of information, limited markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations and policies. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets, of which frontier markets are a subset, involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets’ smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets. Because these frameworks are typically even less developed in frontier markets, as well as various factors including the increased potential for extreme price volatility, illiquidity, trade barriers and exchange controls, the risks associated with emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. To the extent a strategy focuses on particular countries, regions, industries, sectors or types of investment from time to time, it may be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in such areas of focus than a strategy that invests in a wider variety of countries, regions, industries, sectors or investments.

Important legal information. This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton Investments (“FTI”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FTI accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FTI affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own professional adviser or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com - Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton Investments’ U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.

Image: iStock.com/3sbworld

Try Fund Library Premium

Free with a 30 day trial!

Gain access to

  • Unlimited Watchlists
  • Advanced Search Filtering
  • Fund Comparisons
  • Portfolio Scenarios
  • Customizable PDF Reports
  • Portfolio Rebalancer new