Canada’s monetary policy paused, inflation contained

Scant evidence of demand-driven inflationary pressure despite energy hikes

Canadian monetary policy is currently characterized by a deliberate pause, with the Bank of Canada maintaining its policy rate at 2.25% on June 10 as it navigates a complex macroeconomic backdrop. Policymakers assess that the current stance is appropriately calibrated to balance competing forces within the economy, including a weaker growth environment evidenced by a modest contraction in GDP in the first quarter of 2026 and persistent excess supply, alongside inflation dynamics in which headline inflation has been temporarily elevated by energy prices while underlying core measures remain contained in their trend.

As illustrated in Figure 1, Canadian bond markets continue to price in approximately one additional policy rate increase, a moderation from the one to two hikes that had been expected prior to the announcement of a 60-day ceasefire memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran. In our view, such tightening is unlikely to materialize.

First, the Canadian economy continues to operate below potential, with residual slack evident despite emerging signs of stabilization in labour market conditions and expectations for a near-term rebound in activity. This backdrop, combined with easing momentum in core inflation, provides scope for the Bank of Canada to maintain its policy rate on hold through 2026. Policymakers are also contending with an environment of elevated uncertainty, driven by oil price volatility, geopolitical developments, and ongoing trade negotiations, which reinforces the value of preserving policy optionality.

Second, core inflation, as measured by CPI median and CPI trim, is currently within the Bank of Canada’s target range at a 2.05% average.

Third, there is little evidence of demand driven inflationary pressure, as economic slack persists and recent developments in the Middle East represent a supply side shock, an impulse that monetary policy is not well suited to address.

Fourth, the increase in bond yields and the associated rise in term premium have already contributed to tighter financial conditions, implying that the stance of monetary policy has become more restrictive through market channels.

Finally, the Bank of Canada appears to assess that the current inflationary impulse reflects a temporary supply shock that can be looked through, further reducing the urgency for additional policy tightening.

Alternatively, the case against policy easing is also grounded in the broader macroeconomic and policy environment. Fiscal policy in Canada remains supportive, effectively placing a floor under how accommodative monetary policy can become. At the same time, the impact of trade tensions appears concentrated in specific sectors rather than pervasive across the economy, suggesting that broad-based monetary stimulus would be an imprecise and potentially inefficient response.

More fundamentally, monetary policy is ill-suited to address sector-specific dislocations. Easing financial conditions is unlikely to reverse structurally driven employment losses, such as those affecting auto workers in regions like Woodstock, Ontario, where job outcomes are tied more closely to trade dynamics and industrial restructuring than to the level of interest rates.

Inflation

Our inflation view remains constructive. Headline CPI rose to 3.2% in May, but the increase was overwhelmingly driven by energy, with gasoline prices accounting for most of the upside surprise. By contrast, inflation excluding gasoline was 2.2%, while the Bank of Canada’s preferred core measures remained close to target, with CPI-trim at 2.0% year over year and CPI-median at 2.1%, leaving core inflation broadly around 2.3% and under control as Figure 2 below illustrates.

The broader message is that underlying inflation pressures remain far more benign than the headline suggests, with limited evidence that higher energy prices are feeding through in a meaningful way to the rest of the consumer basket. Figure 3 below highlights that energy and transportation inflation remain well above their 10‑year averages, while most other components are broadly in line with historical norms, even as overall goods inflation continues to run somewhat elevated.

There are several reasons for that view.

• First, there is still clear slack in the economy, and that slack is continuing to exert disinflationary pressure across a wide range of categories. Economic activity has been weak, the economy remains in excess supply, and the output gap is helping to offset the inflation impulse from higher oil prices.
• Second, some of the stickier components of inflation are still running high but are moving in the right direction. Grocery inflation has eased from earlier highs, rent inflation has decelerated, and mortgage interest costs have already turned negative on a year-over-year basis.
• Third, slower population growth should reinforce that cooling trend. Population declines are likely to further ease housing demand, which should put additional downward pressure on rents and home prices over time, while the currently soft housing backdrop is already weighing on housing-related goods demand.

That softer housing environment is also showing up in the goods channel. Home prices are falling, housing activity remains weak, and softer resale and construction conditions are consistent with lower demand for household durables such as furniture and appliances.

We would add that tariff pass-through to consumer prices has been slow, helped by the removal of retaliatory tariffs, which should further limit upside pressure on core goods inflation.

At the same time, higher bond yields are delivering an additional tightening impulse to the economy, which should restrain demand and reduce inflation pressure over time even without further action from the Bank of Canada.

None of this means the inflation shock is painless. The burden from higher energy prices is falling disproportionately on lower-income households, which spend a larger share of discretionary income on fuel and transportation, even if the macro-level pass-through beyond gasoline remains limited. Overall, our view is that the inflation story is still fundamentally one of headline volatility rather than renewed underlying price pressure, and we continue to expect core inflation to remain broadly steady at around 2.2% through the year.

Ashish Dewan CFA, CFP is Senior Investment Strategist at Vanguard Investments Canada. Excerpted from Vanguard’s “Canada 2026 Q3 Outlook: A Softer Start to the Year Masks a Stable Underlying Economic Backdrop.”

Disclaimer

Content © 2026 by Vanguard Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part by any means without prior written permission is prohibited. This article first appeared July 3, 2026, on the “Insights” page of the Vanguard Group, Inc.’s website. Used with permission. All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. Be aware that fluctuations in the financial markets and other factors may cause declines in the value of your account. There is no guarantee that any particular asset allocation or mix of funds will meet your investment objectives or provide you with a given level of income. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.

Investments in bonds are subject to interest rate, credit, and inflation risk.

Investments in stocks and bonds issued by non- U.S. companies are subject to risks including country/regional risk and currency risk. These risks are especially high in emerging markets.

IMPORTANT: The projections and other information generated by the Vanguard Capital Markets Model regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. VCMM results will vary with each use and over time.

The VCMM projections are based on a statistical analysis of historical data. Future returns may behave differently from the historical patterns captured in the VCMM. More important, the VCMM may be underestimating extreme negative scenarios unobserved in the historical period on which the model estimation is based.

The Vanguard Capital Markets Model® is a proprietary financial simulation tool developed and maintained by Vanguard’s primary investment research and advice teams. The model forecasts distributions of future returns for a wide array of broad asset classes. Those asset classes include U.S. and international equity markets, several maturities of the U.S. Treasury and corporate fixed income markets, international fixed income markets, U.S. money markets, commodities, and certain alternative investment strategies. The theoretical and empirical foundation for the Vanguard Capital Markets Model is that the returns of various asset classes reflect the compensation investors require for bearing different types of systematic risk (beta). At the core of the model are estimates of the dynamic statistical relationship between risk factors and asset returns, obtained from statistical analysis based on available monthly financial and economic data from as early as 1960. Using a system of estimated equations, the model then applies a Monte Carlo simulation method to project the estimated interrelationships among risk factors and asset classes as well as uncertainty and randomness over time. The model generates a large set of simulated outcomes for each asset class over several time horizons. Forecasts are obtained by computing measures of central tendency in these simulations. Results produced by the tool will vary with each use and over time.

Image: iStock.com/Matheus Silva