BUILDING WEALTH WITH GORDON PAPE
The federal election campaign is in full swing now. One of the issues that is almost certain to come up is the new increased contribution limits for Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs). But let’s not stop there. The TFSA issue is just the tip of the iceberg. What we need is a wide-ranging debate on the entire retirement planning and tax-sheltered savings spectrum.
The Globe and Mail ran a five-part editorial series not too long ago called “Reforming Retirement.” It’s not often The Globe devotes so much editorial page space to a single issue, so hopefully the politicians in Ottawa are paying attention.
The series covered a range of retirement-related matters, from TFSAs to the Canada Pension Plan. One editorial that I found especially interesting – perhaps because it echoed my own long-held views – was a call to immediately repeal the mandatory withdrawal rules related to RRIFs.
CRA’s RRIF cash grab
As The Globe editors pointed out, the requirement that a certain percentage of RRIF assets be withdrawn and taxed annually was introduced as a cash grab at a time when Ottawa was running big deficits and was searching for revenue wherever it could be found. At the time, interest rates were much higher than they are today, thus making it more feasible to generate the income needed to cover the withdrawals without incurring unreasonable risk. That is no longer the case.
You can convert all or part of an RRSP to a RRIF at any time. However, as soon as you do the minimum withdrawal requirement kicks in. Therefore, I suggest you keep most of your money in an RRSP until the mandatory conversion age of 71. There are no minimum withdrawals from an RRSP, and unlike a RRIF, you can continue to make contributions. But once you turn 65, move just enough money into a RRIF to allow for a $2,000 annual withdrawal, which is eligible for the pension income credit.
Under the current formula, the minimum RRIF withdrawal up to age 71 is based on the value of the RRIF on Jan. 1 of any given year divided by 90 minus your age. So if you have $100,000 in your RRIF and you are 70 years old, the minimum withdrawal is $100,000/20 or $5,000. That’s a 5% rate. Under proposed new rules introduced in the April federal budget, the minimum withdrawal rate after age 71 would be reduced slightly, to 5.28%, climbing to 18.7% by age 94 and will remain capped at 20% after that. The budget bill is now before the House, and may be passed before the House breaks for summer this month. For the sake of convenience, I've used the old numbers in my example, but the principle remains the same.
After age 70, the government really starts demanding its pound of flesh. At age 71, the minimum withdrawal increases to 7.38%. By age 80, it’s up to 8.75%, and at 85 it’s 10.33%. At that level, the plan depletes at an alarming rate.
RRIF assets should be conservatively invested, for obvious reasons. But with interest rates so low, this means that even a target return of 5%, which is well below the minimum withdrawal rate after age 71, entails more risk than may be appropriate.
Let’s look at the impact on every $100,000 worth of capital in a RRIF under the current system, assuming a 5% annual return and an annual lump-sum withdrawal of the minimum amount made at year-end.
This is not a pretty picture. Even as the minimum percentage withdrawal increases, the actual amount the annuitant receives steadily declines. After 10 years between ages 71 and 80, you’re receiving about 9% less income than when you started. Plus, you’ve lost more than 23% of your capital.
The situation only gets worse in subsequent years as the minimum withdrawal escalates. Look what happens between ages 81 and 90.
Does this make sense to anyone who is not CRA tax collector? By age 90, more than 55% of the original capital is gone and the annual payments are down 18.4% from where they were at 71. Even if we experienced 20 years of zero inflation, that would create a major financial problem.
And don’t even ask what happens after age 90. By the time you hit 94, the payments have to come out of the RRIF at the rate of 20% a year. With life expectancy steadily increasing, we risk seeing older Canadians run out of money before they die, creating a serious socio-economic problem.
The solution is very simple: abolish all mandatory RRIF withdrawals and allow people to take out the money as they need it. In the end, it will all be taxed anyway. What’s the rush? There is simply no rationale for maintaining the status quo.
This is the position I have maintained for some time. In fact, I presented just such a proposal a few years ago to a Senate committee looking into our retirement planning system. Naturally, nothing happened.
Enough talk. It’s time for the federal government to take action.
Gordon Pape is one of Canada’s best-known personal finance commentators and investment experts. He is the publisher of The Internet Wealth Builder and The Income Investor newsletter, which are available through the Building Wealth website.
For information on subscriptions to Gordon Pape's newsletters go to www.buildingwealth.ca
Follow Gordon Pape’s latest updates on Twitter @GPUpdates.
Notes and Disclaimer
© 2015 by The Fund Library. All rights reserved.
The foregoing is for general information purposes only and is the opinion of the writer. Securities mentioned carry risk of loss, and no guarantee of performance is made or implied. This information is not intended to provide specific personalized advice including, without limitation, investment, financial, legal, accounting or tax advice.