Last updated: Jun-20-2018

6/21/2018 10:34:37 AM
Show Printable Version Download Plain Text
Veteran business journalist and investigative reporter Olev Edur takes you behind the performance numbers for close-up look at the people, processes, and portfolios that make investment funds tick.

By Olev Edur  | Thursday, June 04, 2015

To say the past several years have not been kind to natural resource funds would be a bit of an understatement – the five-year average annual compound return from the category was a less-than-impressive -6.8% through April 2015, and the one-year return through April was a dismal -18.9%. Nevertheless, Chris Beer, manager of the category-beating RBC Global Resources Fund, sees room for optimism.

Much of the past year’s underperformance stemmed from the collapse of crude oil prices (from US$115 per barrel in June 2014 down to U$S46 a barrel in January 2015). Prices have since recovered a bit of ground, though, and had reached US$63 a barrel by the end of April.

The net result has been a recent rebound in resource fund performance. Despite that dismal one-year return, natural resource funds generated an average 5.1% during the three months ended April 30, 2015, and 3.2% during the month of April alone.

Of course, some individual funds have fared much better since the recession in 2009. The RBC Global Resources Fund, for example, has returned a respectable 8.9% year to date to April 30. It managed a five-year average annual compound return of 1.3% through April, and a loss of “only” -8.9% in the past 12 months, resulting in a still respectable 10-year return averaging 9.1% annually.

Part of the reason for its stronger showing, according to Chris Beer, vice-president and senior portfolio manager of global equities at RBC Global Asset Management Inc. in Toronto, and co-manager (along with  Brahm Spilfogel) of the resource fund, was an underweighted position in energy.


“The benchmark for natural resource funds is 59% energy and 41% materials, and we’re now at 54% energy,” says Beer, but adds that the recent downturn in energy fortunes has presented some buying opportunities. “We’ve been increasing our energy holdings of late,” he says. “We think the real normalized price of oil should be in the US$70 to US$75 a barrel range.”

In building its position, however, the fund’s bottom-up focus is on “E&P” (exploration and production) companies rather than the big integrated players. “E&Ps like Encana tend to outperform the integrateds, which are more defensive. [The latter] have better dividend yields, but they also tend to have the most trouble growing. If you look through the list of integrated companies, the only ones with four-to-five percent growth and a four-to-five percent yield, with a strong management team, are Total and Suncor (Courbevoie, France-based Total SA, and Calgary, Alberta-based Suncor Energy Inc.).”

Beer also says that while natural gas production is strong, the sector has been hurt by a lack of distribution capacity. “There’s lots of gas but not enough pipelines,” he notes. “In this scenario, the low-cost producers will displace the high-cost producers; the low-cost ones are usually the last guys standing.”

For the rest, Beer believes some companies in the materials sector are currently somewhat better positioned than energy stocks, hence the fund’s continued overweighting versus energy, despite recent energy stock purchases. “During the last little while, we’ve been in a U.S. dollar bull market, and we think that still has two to three years to play out,” he says.

“North American chemical, forest products, and pipelines companies will tend to do better than mines, which are more globally oriented,” Beer adds. “We’re positive on oil prices, but right now natural gas is in oversupply, and we think that will benefit North American chemical producers.”

And overall, despite the difficulties of the past few years, Beer remains positive. “Natural resources have underperformed since 2007, and the sector has certainly seen some bad times,” he says. “But if global growth recouples, we think the sector will see stronger growth again.”


Olev Edur is an experienced financial and business journalist and a frequent contributor to the Fund Library.

Notes and Disclaimers

© 2015 by Fund Library. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part by any means without written permission is prohibited.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the simplified prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed and are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit insurer. There can be no assurances that the fund will be able to maintain its net asset value per security at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment in the fund will be returned to you. Fund values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. No guarantee of performance is made or implied. The foregoing is for general information purposes only. This information is not intended to provide specific personalized advice including, without limitation, investment, financial, legal, accounting or tax advice.

Find a Stock

(Leave blank for all)
Symbol   Name
Forgot your password?
Register now
Tech Support
For general inquiries, please email the Librarian.
Home |  Features |  Member Services |  Tools |  Funds |  About Us
For any questions or problems with this site, please contact the Librarian.
Page ID: 20:30:1056:00015383:9/12/2017:4:10:55 PM Duration of this visit: 0 sec.