Last updated: Nov-15-2018

    
 
The active vs. passive debate: who wins?
11/16/2018 9:11:48 AM
HOME : FEATURES : COLUMNS : The active vs. passive debate: who wins?
Show Printable Version Download Plain Text
 
Fund Library News
News, announcements, and updates from Fund Library



By Fund Library News Wire  | Friday, June 22, 2018


 

A SPECIAL REPORT FROM



By Nash Swamy, Junior Analyst, Analytics & Data, Fundata Canada Inc.

Toward the end of 2016, the active vs. passive portfolio management style debate raged. Those arguing in favour of active management predicted that actively-managed funds would outperform the broader market universe in 2017, including index funds. How did that turn out? The results might be an eye-opener to some.

History has shown that surpassing benchmark performance – or even beating the market rate of return – is becoming increasingly difficult.

As world economies become more interconnected, capital markets continue to move towards the strong market hypothesis theorem. Looking back at 2017, we see that several events occurred in global financial and political markets fueled one of the strongest bull runs in market history.

Among the most important events was the election of Donald Trump as 45 th President of the United States. Capital markets took a particular liking to this, as the “priced-in” result of the election had Hillary Clinton as the favourite. At the time, healthcare sector stocks and broad equities alike were pummeled. But markets revived on Trump’s relatively laid back stance on corporate tax cuts and a promise to spend a massive $1 trillion on infrastructure, having a halo effect in Canada and other regions of the world.

Canada had quite the year in terms of economic developments during 2017. With inflation at near all-time highs during 2016 and early 2017, Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz finally began to unwind the decade-long stimulation of low interest rates that followed the financial crisis of 2008. The timing of the rate hikes was critical, as Canadian house price indexes had soared along with the flow of easy money to higher credit-risk individuals.

After a couple of rate hikes, the Canadian target overnight bank rate now sits at 1.25%, which along with other measures like special forms of local taxation on foreign buyers and mortgage stress tests, has helped bring sky-high real estate valuations back to earth, taking some of the steam out of real-estate-bubble alarmism.

The year also proved to be an important one for many other countries. A particular catalyst to Asian capital markets came with the appointment of China’s Premier Xi Jinping to a second (and probably perpetual) five-year term in office. Other noteworthy events included the accession of a new “modern-capitalist” heir to Saudi Arabia’s throne, Mohammad bin Salman, whose views closely align with those of President Trump. Bin Salman has also proposed taking state-owned Saudi Aramco public, a move that would trigger some portfolio rebalancing for our energy sector professionals indeed.

Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Theresa May continues to negotiate towards a soft exit (Brexit) from the European Union (EU) by triggering Article 50 of the EU agreement and extending negotiations to March 29, 2019. As a result, geopolitical uncertainty remains, while volatility has ramped up in U.K. and European markets.

Using Fundata’s proprietary database and investment fund information, we extrapolated the return of different investment vehicles on an aggregated basis, mimicking the larger Canadian, U.S. and global equity markets.

The graph shows the mean and median returns for Canadian Equity, U.S. Equity, and Global Equity vehicles using a universe of approximately 1,000 mutual funds and ETFs.

In some types of equity funds, index-based funds outperformed actively-managed funds in 2017. In other cases, it was a wash or nearly so. It is noteworthy that investment funds with global mandates outperformed their indexing peers in both the mutual fund and ETF categories. To understand why this occurred in this category specifically, we analyzed holdings data and concluded that the bulk of these global mandate funds held U.S.-based securities; hence, they benefitted from the optimistic sentiment driving capital markets south of the border during 2017.

During a recent conference call, portfolio manager Jeremy Yeung of CI Investments, who co-manages the CI Signature Global Science & Technology Fund, weighed in on the performance of equity markets during 2017: “The Canadian market is highly concentrated. If you look at the top-10 names in Canada, they hover around oil and financials,” he said. “The United States is a very tech-centric market, with nearly a 20% makeup for S&P coming from information technology. If you were not overweight technology in 2017, you would have an underperforming fund,” he added.

“The technology sector was the underlying driver to the U.S. market boom in 2017, and the majority of managers do not understand the business model or valuation,” said Yeung, adding, “Digital disruption continues to be the driver of capital market expansion in the United States and China. We continue to welcome the fundamental shift from offline to online in the coming years.”

So does passive management (indexing) prevail as a choice of style? Not necessarily. As always, it depends on your personal investment goals. Some active mutual funds and ETFs posted stellar results, including Yeung’s Signature Global Science and Technology Fund, with a calendar return of 33.46% in 2017.

It is always important to perform all your due diligence when selecting an investment fund, taking into account the competency of the managers, their access to company management, and overall investment style. Whether you are an indexer or active investor, doing macro-level research can translate to a fairly large difference in your ultimate investment return.

Nash Swamy is Junior Analyst, Analytics & Data, at Fundata Canada Inc., a leading source for investment fund information.

Notes and Disclaimers

© 2018 by Fund Library. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part by any means without prior written permission is prohibited.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with fund investments. Please read the simplified prospectus before investing. Investment funds are not guaranteed and are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit insurer. There can be no assurances that the fund will be able to maintain its net asset value per security at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment in the fund will be returned to you. Fund values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. The foregoing is for general information purposes only and is the opinion of the writer. No guarantee of performance is made or implied. This information is not intended to provide specific personalized advice including, without limitation, investment, financial, legal, accounting or tax advice.

 
:: STOCK SEARCH
Find a Stock

(Leave blank for all)
Symbol   Name
:: MEMBER SERVICES
Username:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Register now
Tech Support
:: USEFUL LINKS
For general inquiries, please email the Librarian.
 
Home |  Features |  Member Services |  Tools |  Funds |  About Us
For any questions or problems with this site, please contact the Librarian.
Page ID: 20:40:1051:00016651:9/12/2017:3:10:55 PM Duration of this visit: 0 sec.